New📚 Exciting News! Introducing Maman Book – Your Ultimate Companion for Literary Adventures! Dive into a world of stories with Maman Book today! Check it out

Write Sign In
Maman BookMaman Book
Write
Sign In
Member-only story

Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit Diversity And Faculty Gatekeeping

Jese Leos
·18.5k Followers· Follow
Published in Julie R Posselt
6 min read
454 View Claps
42 Respond
Save
Listen
Share

Graduate admissions are a complex process that involves a variety of factors, including academic achievement, research experience, letters of recommendation, and personal statements. In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on diversity in graduate admissions, as universities strive to create more inclusive and equitable environments. However, the pursuit of diversity can sometimes come into conflict with the traditional emphasis on merit-based admissions.

In this article, we will explore the complex relationship between merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping in graduate admissions. We will begin by discussing the different ways in which merit is defined and evaluated in graduate admissions. We will then examine the evidence for and against the use of race-conscious admissions policies as a means of increasing diversity. Finally, we will consider the role of faculty gatekeeping in the graduate admissions process and discuss the ways in which faculty can help to create more inclusive and equitable admissions practices.

Defining and Evaluating Merit in Graduate Admissions

Merit is a complex concept that can be defined in a variety of ways. In the context of graduate admissions, merit is typically understood to refer to a combination of academic achievement, research experience, and letters of recommendation. However, there is no single definition of merit, and different universities and departments may have different criteria for evaluating it.

Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit Diversity and Faculty Gatekeeping
Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping
by Julie R. Posselt

4.8 out of 5

Language : English
File size : 2169 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 266 pages

One common way to measure academic achievement is through undergraduate GPA. However, GPA is not a perfect measure of merit, as it can be influenced by a variety of factors, such as the difficulty of the coursework taken, the grading practices of individual professors, and the quality of the undergraduate institution.

Research experience is another important factor that is often considered in graduate admissions. Research experience can demonstrate a student's ability to conduct independent research, think critically, and solve problems. However, research experience is not always equally accessible to all students, as it may require access to specialized equipment or mentorship from a faculty member.

Letters of recommendation are also an important part of the graduate admissions process. Letters of recommendation can provide insights into a student's academic abilities, research skills, and personal qualities. However, letters of recommendation can also be biased, as they may be written by professors who have a personal or professional relationship with the student.

In addition to these traditional measures of merit, some universities and departments are also considering other factors, such as socioeconomic status, first-generation status, and military service. These factors can be seen as indicators of a student's resilience, determination, and potential for success in graduate school.

The Evidence for and Against Race-Conscious Admissions Policies

Race-conscious admissions policies are policies that take race into account in the admissions process. These policies are designed to increase the diversity of the student body by giving preferential treatment to students from underrepresented minority groups.

There is a large body of research that supports the use of race-conscious admissions policies. This research has shown that race-conscious admissions policies can increase the number of underrepresented minority students in graduate programs, and that these students can be just as successful as their non-minority peers.

However, there is also some opposition to the use of race-conscious admissions policies. Critics of these policies argue that they are unfair to non-minority students and that they can lead to a decline in academic standards.

The debate over race-conscious admissions policies is complex and there is no easy answer. However, the evidence suggests that these policies can be an effective way to increase diversity in graduate education.

The Role of Faculty Gatekeeping in the Graduate Admissions Process

Faculty gatekeeping refers to the role that faculty members play in the graduate admissions process. Faculty members are responsible for evaluating applications, making admissions decisions, and mentoring graduate students. As such, they have a great deal of power over who is admitted to graduate school and who is not.

Faculty gatekeeping can be a barrier to diversity in graduate education. This is because faculty members may be biased against students from underrepresented minority groups, or they may simply not be aware of the challenges that these students face.

There are a number of things that faculty members can do to help create more inclusive and equitable admissions practices. These include:

  • Becoming more aware of their own biases. Faculty members should be aware of their own biases and how they might influence their admissions decisions.
  • Learning about the challenges that students from underrepresented minority groups face. Faculty members should learn about the challenges that students from underrepresented minority groups face, so that they can better understand their experiences and needs.
  • Mentoring students from underrepresented minority groups. Faculty members should mentor students from underrepresented minority groups, so that they can help them to succeed in graduate school.
  • Advocating for policies that increase diversity. Faculty members should advocate for policies that increase diversity in graduate education, such as race-conscious admissions policies.

By taking these steps, faculty members can help to create a more inclusive and equitable graduate admissions process.

The graduate admissions process is a complex one that involves a variety of factors, including merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping. In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on diversity in graduate admissions, as universities strive to create more inclusive and equitable environments. However, the pursuit of diversity can sometimes come into conflict with the traditional emphasis on merit-based admissions.

In this article, we have explored the complex relationship between merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping in graduate admissions. We have discussed the different ways in which merit is defined and evaluated in graduate admissions, and we have examined the evidence for and against the use of race-conscious admissions policies as a means of increasing diversity. Finally, we have considered the role of faculty gatekeeping in the graduate admissions process and discussed the ways in which faculty can help to create more inclusive and equitable admissions practices.

Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit Diversity and Faculty Gatekeeping
Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping
by Julie R. Posselt

4.8 out of 5

Language : English
File size : 2169 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 266 pages
Create an account to read the full story.
The author made this story available to Maman Book members only.
If you’re new to Maman Book, create a new account to read this story on us.
Already have an account? Sign in
454 View Claps
42 Respond
Save
Listen
Share

Light bulbAdvertise smarter! Our strategic ad space ensures maximum exposure. Reserve your spot today!

Good Author
  • Yasunari Kawabata profile picture
    Yasunari Kawabata
    Follow ·17.9k
  • Oscar Wilde profile picture
    Oscar Wilde
    Follow ·17.8k
  • Isaac Asimov profile picture
    Isaac Asimov
    Follow ·11.1k
  • Harrison Blair profile picture
    Harrison Blair
    Follow ·16.8k
  • Victor Turner profile picture
    Victor Turner
    Follow ·13.1k
  • Russell Mitchell profile picture
    Russell Mitchell
    Follow ·13.9k
  • W.H. Auden profile picture
    W.H. Auden
    Follow ·6.9k
  • Brayden Reed profile picture
    Brayden Reed
    Follow ·3.1k
Recommended from Maman Book
Peer Feedback In The Classroom: Empowering Students To Be The Experts
Terry Bell profile pictureTerry Bell
·4 min read
460 View Claps
56 Respond
Shangri La Frontier #82 Katarina
Raymond Chandler profile pictureRaymond Chandler
·6 min read
1.5k View Claps
89 Respond
Monsters: A King Slater Thriller (The King Slater 11)
Oscar Bell profile pictureOscar Bell

The King Slater 11: Monsters

In the eleventh installment of the bestselling...

·4 min read
769 View Claps
81 Respond
Food Wars : Shokugeki No Soma Vol 30: The Way They Do Things
Guillermo Blair profile pictureGuillermo Blair
·5 min read
689 View Claps
83 Respond
Empath V Empathy Nicola Quinn
Rex Hayes profile pictureRex Hayes
·6 min read
71 View Claps
6 Respond
Apple Pie And Follies: An Abi Button Cozy Mystery Romance #6
Wade Cox profile pictureWade Cox
·4 min read
577 View Claps
38 Respond
The book was found!
Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit Diversity and Faculty Gatekeeping
Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping
by Julie R. Posselt

4.8 out of 5

Language : English
File size : 2169 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 266 pages
Sign up for our newsletter and stay up to date!

By subscribing to our newsletter, you'll receive valuable content straight to your inbox, including informative articles, helpful tips, product launches, and exciting promotions.

By subscribing, you agree with our Privacy Policy.


© 2024 Maman Bookâ„¢ is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved.